Much digital ink is spilled upon the subject of why so many are romantically frustrated. If they would but think on the math, they would immediately understand there is no fix to the problem within their lifetime.
We have an inverted population pyramid, where less and less new women are available in new generations. Women always prefer to pair with older men, as they have more resources and therefore time with which to woo them. This means that a larger pool of older men will be competing for a smaller pool of younger women. It is mathematically impossible for every man therefore to successfully reproduce, no matter how much they game or looksmaxx.
I remember hearing decades ago about China's "excess male" problem thanks to the one-child policy. The entire developed world has this problem now (save Russia and Ukraine thanks to liquidating their excess males in war), and has not yet realized this. Even in societies with a normal population pyramid, expatriates looking for love will make this a problem for the locals by solving their own reproductive problem. "Unrealistic" female expectations of their mate is simply downstream of them being spoiled for choice. Young males will be frustrated until they become established older males, and in many cases not even then. There is nothing whatsoever that can fix this other than the succeeding generations becoming larger than that which preceedeth.
The only coping strategy that is viable in the meantime is temporally displaced polyandry as embodied by the dual mating strategy of single mothers. That, or take the TFM strategy of unapologetic pursuit of substitutes. In more extreme cases this will simply result in war. This will not change during the lifetime of anyone currently living. Most of politics will be downstream of these simple mathematical ratios for the forseeable future. It's not black-pilling to simply recognize facts.
As a result, more U.S. biotech firms are beginning to move parts of their clinical development to China. A Time magazine headline from May 2025 captures what many industry experts have been warning for years: βThe US canβt afford to lose the biotech race with China.β This is no longer a hypothetical concern. Data is backing this fear up: US early-stage funding is deteriorating: dropping from $2.6 billion in Q1 to just $900 million in Q2 2025 β the lowest level in five quarters. If this trend continues, it could gradually shift the center of gravity for biomedical innovation abroad. In the long run, this poses risks not only to U.S. biotech competitiveness but also to biosecurity, much like the earlier offshoring of manufacturing supply chains created strategic vulnerabilities.I'm sure they're still gonna be sitting around with their heads up their asses up in DC whenever even the defense industry regulatory arbitrages itself out of the country.
If we can grasp that those being killed are being killed because they are enemies of the state, then the logical thing for us to ask ourselves is this: is there any chance that we or anyone we care about could ever under any circumstances be considered an enemy of the state? That question should not be very difficult to answer.I keep telling people this is predictive programming, getting us ready for the loving conscription squads which are coming soon to a theater near you.
...
Before I was banned, many accused me of being some kind of stooge, purposefully pushing outrageous speech in a way that would justify censorship. I considered it, of course. As one does when he is accused of such things. However, I ultimately decided that it was necessary for someone to push the envelope on freedom of speech in order to demonstrate whether it was actually something that existed in real life. It turned out that no, it did not, and it was only a few short years before everyone found that out.
With the anti-ICE protesters, itβs a bit different and a bit the same. The feds need outrageous people to attack them in order for them to justify implementing these new standards of murdering people who resist whatever it is they are doing. I have zero doubt that the feds themselves are the ones organizing these groups to attack, and I resent the fact that people on the right are acting as though βthe leftβ is a serious ideological movement.
βWe believe the suit has no merit,β a bank spokesperson said. βJPMC does not close accounts for political or religious reasons. We do close accounts because they create legal or regulatory risk for the company.βFish: what's water?