As the βdefund the policeβ movement gains momentum, police officers are leaving the profession in droves. My agency is no exception. Soon, very few people, if any, will apply for this job. In order to fill vacancies, agencies will have to eliminate written tests, lower hiring standards, and look the other way on questionable backgrounds. This has all been tried before in the name of βdiversity,β and led to incompetent, untrustworthy, corrupt officers. This is a disaster for any society.It's of course gonna be a self-fulfilling prophecy. The incentives surrounding all bureaucracies guarantee this is the outcome. All police agencies succumb eventually, everywhere. Government is always and everywhere eventually filled by those who simply cannot be employed in any useful profession. That is the essence of the political means.
I have been harmed far more by white people in this country who hold to radical liberal and neocon values than by black people.Damn straight. The fools empowering Mordor on the Potomac and our local tyrants are a far worse menace to the world. Be they white liberals or race hustlers it's all the same.
Lewis then said that in Stafford Smithβs written evidence paras 92-6 he had listed specific Wikileaks cables which related to disclosure of drone policy. But publication of these particular cables did not form part of the indictment. Lewis read out part of an affidavit from US Assistant Attorney Kromberg which stated that Assange was being indicted only for cables containing the publication of names of informants.This alone ought to be lethal to the extradition. Nobody has a reasonable expectation that upon extradition the USA will restrict itself to prosecution of the crimes for which Assange is purportedly to be extradited for. The record of the USA giving 0 shits about their lawful treaty obligations is miles long.
Stafford Smith replied that Kromberg may state that, but in practice that would not be the case in the United States. The charge was of conspiracy, and the way such charges were defined in the US system would allow the widest inclusion of evidence. The first witness at trial would be a βterrorism expertβ who would draw a wide and far reaching picture of the history of threat against the USA.
So JPMorgan Chase makes money off these transactions while sustaining zero risk.Yeah, that's kinda the point of all GSEs
So this is a 288-page book written by a Very Online Person in support of the idea that other people should loot, riot, and burn things in the real world.
Style-wise, In Defense of Looting continues the impressive streak of the woke movement having yet to produce a single readable piece of literature.
The founding fathers and the majority of American presidents throughout history were white supremacists. If theyβre true to their own values, Republicans should want to detonate and flatten almost the entirety of Washingtonβs statuary. Perhaps what needs to be toppled is not the effigies of men who presided over a functioning society, but the edifice of Martin Luther King, whose legacy renders America a failed state on the precipice of civil war.It's not a coincidence that the reaction to the failure of white supremacism in the 20th century was the twofold rise of fem supremacism and black supremacism. Either ideology is plenty dangerous without the communist ideology the thought leaders of both subscribe to. But nobody in the USA is interested in individualism; the market for tyranny is booming.