...in spite of the huge excitement about our ability to see into the brain using the so-called field of neuroscience:
Understanding how the subparts of the brain (say, neurons) work will never allow us to understand how the brain works.
So far we have no f***g idea how the brain of the worm C elegans works, which has around three hundred neurons. C elegans was the first living unit to have its gene sequenced. Now consider that the human brain has about one hundred billion neurons. and that going from 300 to 301 neurons may double the complexity. [I have actually found situations where a single additional dimension may more than double some aspect of the complexity, say going from a 1000 to 1001 may cause complexity to be multiplied by a billion times.] So use of never here is appropriate. And if you also want to understand why, in spite of the trumpeted βadvancesβ in sequencing the DNA, we are largely unable to get information except in small isolated pockets of some diseases.
Understanding the genetic make-up of a unit will never allow us to understand the behavior of the unit itself.
A reminder that what I am writing here isnβt an opinion. It is a straightforward mathematical property.
While Killary is bad, at least nobody pretends she's a goody-goody. It's the ones who think they're doing good in power that are the really dangerous ones. Think Woodrow Wilson.
Hereβs the non-gobbledygook explanation: The state is a group of gangsters running a protection racket. You can play by their rules and jump through their hoops as much as you like, but when they decide youβre getting too big for your britches they swoop in to take you down a peg.
Also says he don't want no trouble with the Chinese. All I have to say is, REGIME CHANGE INBOUND! They don't take kindly to stepping on our cornpone round these parts...
November 5, 2017. Why would Russians choose Guy Fawkes day? Aping their betters (and likely funders), one assumes. Nevertheless it has a 0% chance of working as far as I can tell.