I wanted to see how serious proponents of evolutionary biology would respond to awkward questions.
It was like giving a bobcat a prostate exam. I got everything but answers. They told me I was a crank, implied over and over (again) that I was a Creationist, said that I was an enemy of science (someone who asks for evidence is an enemy of science). They said that I was trying to pull down modern biology (if you ask questions about an aspect of biology, you want to pull down biology). They told me I didnβt know anything (thatβs why I was asking questions), and that I was a mere journalist (the validity of a question depends on its source rather than its content).
It's the same with climate "science", when you really get down to it, there's no evidence their models accurately represent, well, anything. This article is a great takedown of that, and all other heads of the hydra of scientism.