To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.No, because the current government is always and everywhere immune to prosecution when it controls the justice system. That was decided long, long ago.
Once you factor out interview data from both men and women who quit after one or two bad interviews, the disparity goes away entirely. So while the attrition numbers aren't great, I'm massively encouraged by the fact that at least in these findings, it's not about systemic bias against women or women being bad at computers or whatever. Rather, it's about women being bad at dusting themselves off after failing, which, despite everything, is probably a lot easier to fix.This, x1000. Women are just not used to rejection, this is a fact due to the way male-female relationships work. Men do the asking, women do the rejecting. That said, I am not optimistic this can change; things have been this way a long time for good reasons.
So it seems to me that gun control canβt be solved because Democrats are using guns to kill each other β and want it to stop β whereas Republicans are using guns to defend against Democrats. Psychologically, those are different risk profiles. And you canβt reconcile those interests, except on the margins. For example, both sides might agree that rocket launchers are a step too far. But Democrats are unlikely to talk Republicans out of gun ownership because it comes off as βPut down your gun so I can shoot you.β