...more than 100 truces on all fronts in 1915...Sounds like it was a really popular war with the troops.
In the DEA comment on the entry, Rosenberg directly addressed the question: What if itβs only cannabidiol (CBD) and no other cannabinoids? The agencyβs response: βFor practical purposes, all extracts that contain CBD will also contain at least small amounts of other cannabinoids. However, if it were possible to produce from the cannabis plant an extract that contained only CBD and no other cannabinoids, such an extract would fall within the new drug codeβ and therefore remain federally illegal. In other words: The DEA is confident that it can find enough traces of other cannabinoids in your CBD oil to arrest and prosecute. And if they canβt, they still have the option of arresting and prosecuting based on the CBD oil itself.ITS TO KEEP THE CHILDREN OF THE WORLD SAFE! HAHAHAHHA
Again, this advice has nothing to do with the rights or wrongs of individual peacock issues and more with a general sense that the elites are fiddling while Rome burns. For the first time since records have been kept, U.S. life expectancy went down during the Obama years, led by a disturbing rise in suicides and opiate addiction among discouraged unemployed in flyover country. A Democratic Party that fails to address that while it screws around with bathroom-law boycotts is willfully consigning itself to irrelevance.Good comments on the article too.
Many of Trumpβs βpro-working-classβ policies are objectively terrible; a new wave of trade protectionism is, for example, bound to have dire long-term consequences. But that doesnβt matter, in a political competitive sense, until you Democrats have something to answer him with.
Right now, you have nothing. You have less than nothing, because your instinctive solution repels the Trump plurality. They donβt want welfare, they want jobs and dignity and a modicum of respect. (And, just as a reminder, not to be dismissed as retrograde racists and sexists.)