There are several core errors.
- Packet sources are trivial to spoof for state actors. This is why Ray emphasizes the MARBLE program, and has the whole time.
- The GRU would be morons if their whole division was not prevented from accessing the net without automated proxy policy.
The entirety of the rest of the article requires one to take on faith the assertions of the CIA & NSA (known liars).
So, as usual the evidence of collusion is still not there. The rest of the article is contortions trying to say this conspiracy guy is a russian agent without any substantial proof.
And in the end the "debunking" ultimately fails the test. While the provided explanation doesn't hold water, it can't prove it was exfiltrated online, as would have to have been done by the GRU. So it's still as likely as not to have been an insider leak. My money is on nobody ever finding out the real story; my guess is that the data was hacked because the DNC guys were bozos, and it likely got sold several times until it ended up in Wikileaks' hands. Frankly, the NSA/FBI/CIA are as likely culprits as the GRU given the actual evidence.
