It would work like this: Like the FATCA legislation in the US, the premise is:
An individual is required to provide a detailed report of his wealth (however small).
The regulatory body chooses to regard the report as “in error,” or “incomplete.”
The law then allows all the assets to be confiscated, including those portions that were correctly reported.
Of course, we’d like to think that no reasonable government would abuse power in this way. Unfortunately, history shows that any government that issues a license to itself to rob its citizenry, invariably uses (and abuses) that license.
The beauty of such a system is that it need not be enforced often. Once people understand that, at any moment, they could lose everything and have no recourse whatsoever, they learn to keep their heads down and be compliant.
From that point on, fear of government is a constant, and the population is effectively under house arrest.
Been seeing a bunch of 'heavens to mergatroid, it's too laaaaaate' articles zipping around lately. They are of course bullshit trying to buffalo everyone into .gov scams.
Great overview of the calculus of Quaternions and even higher order mathematics. This is how you properly model higher-order behavior, as there are always more independent variables.
The "Menos Marx, Mais Mises" sort of flies in the face of characterizing this as being a STATO project & NED bullshit. I seem to recall mises.br is really the source of most the libertarian energy in Brazil, not the Kochtopus. It's likely the guy got into libertarianism thanks to those clowns, but I doubt they're still backing him given he's a Mises enthusiast.
...because Obamacare already made the requisite increase in fatal outcomes. Simply wishing for a thing (and clubbing those who disagree) does not make it so, statists -- it usually makes things worse.
