The web was not envisioned as a form of television when it was invented. But, like it or not, it is rapidly resembling TV: linear, passive, programmed and inward-looking.This is fundamentally why I have this site, and do not participate in social media. Control your information, or your information is controlled by others.
When I log on to Facebook, my personal television starts. All I need to do is to scroll: New profile pictures by friends, short bits of opinion on current affairs, links to new stories with short captions, advertising, and of course self-playing videos. I occasionally click on like or share button, read peoplesβ comments or leave one, or open an article. But I remain inside Facebook, and it continues to broadcast what I might like. This is not the web I knew when I went to jail. This is not the future of the web. This future is television.
First they sent a SWAT team to New Zealand to capture Kim Dotcom, a German national, for something thatβs legal in both New Zealand and Germany, and I did not speak out β because I was not in the computer business. Then, they conducted drone strikes and assassinations and renditions around the world, and I did not speak out β because I was not a swarthy foreigner. Then, they invaded countries, from Granada and Panama, to Afghanistan and Iraq, and I did not speak out β because I believed we were always on the side of truth and justice. Then, they prosecuted the FIFA guys, and I did not speak out β because I couldnβt care less about rich guys making money from soccer. Etc. Etc.It is flat-out amazing that the DOJ is (ab)using the same commerce clause justification to squat on all 50 states to do the same to every nation in the world:
If you touch our shores with your corrupt enterprise, whether that is through meetings or through using our world-class financial system, you will be held accountable for that corruption.
In other words, the Department of Justiceβs indictment alleges that since a part of the alleged corruption may have been planned in the US β even if it was then carried out elsewhere β they are in charge. And the use of US banks to transfer US dollars gives them additional jurisdiction.
In other words, by obligating all localities receiving HUD funding to compare their demographics to the region as a whole, AFFH effectively nullifies municipal boundaries. Even with no allegation or evidence of intentional discrimination, the mere existence of a demographic imbalance in the region as a whole must be remedied by a given suburb. Suburbs will literally be forced to import population from elsewhere, at their own expense and in violation of their own laws. In effect, suburbs will have been annexed by a city-dominated region, their laws suspended and their tax money transferred to erstwhile non-residents. And to make sure the new high-density housing developments are close to βcommunity assetsβ such as schools, transportation, parks, and jobs, bedroom suburbs will be forced to develop mini-downtowns. In effect, they will become more like the cities their residents chose to leave in the first place.Smart cities will tell HUD to shove it. I honestly hope this pushes a city to just secede and call it a day. The author's call for 'republicans will fix it' is beyond foolish. They love this plan too.