All going according to plan, as far as I can tell.

Lol, they really hate Trump that badly? I recall it wasn't but last year they were writing hit pieces on Block.

As usual, the USA pays off their pet jihadis when convenient.

Mostly posting due to the interesting comment on the article by Kurt Nimmo.

Hah, people thought things would change? That's rich.

Sounds about right for this point in the cycle.

The ones in question, of course, would limit his power, so that's really no surprise.

Seems Roger Stone will likely talk his way into the slammer, though it seems doubtful he'll take Trump with him.

#MAGA

Old VIA chips with a secret "God Mode" instruction? Feels good, man!

Yet another redpilling attack that should surprise nobody.

Controlled opposition.

So, while Christopher Steele was meeting with journalists, the journalists were writing articles; the FBI was leaking to media and simultaneously citing those same articles as underlying evidence to support their counterintelligence investigations; and all of this was used to validate the investigative documents the FBI was receiving from Christopher Steele; who, along with the leaking FBI officials, was also the source of the media articles. FEELS GOOD MAN

Contagion!

You get one guess what gang was operating it.

Can't say I'm surprised, this has been suspected for years. Excellent that it was Weev who outed him.

Not surprised that he's the voice saying what I've been thinking in reaction to the most recent social media banfest.

Conspirators dispersed. I'm sure they'll keep trying, gotta pay those salaries somehow man

For both users and operators. I was waiting for the other shoe to drop, and here it is. This confirms the whole rotten mess to be a bogus CB to back a massive power grab.

There are several core errors.

1. Packet sources are trivial to spoof for state actors. This is why Ray emphasizes the MARBLE program, and has the whole time.
2. The GRU would be morons if their whole division was not prevented from accessing the net without automated proxy policy.

The entirety of the rest of the article requires one to take on faith the assertions of the CIA & NSA (known liars).

So, as usual the evidence of collusion is still not there. The rest of the article is contortions trying to say this conspiracy guy is a russian agent without any substantial proof.

And in the end the "debunking" ultimately fails the test. While the provided explanation doesn't hold water, it can't prove it was exfiltrated online, as would have to have been done by the GRU. So it's still as likely as not to have been an insider leak. My money is on nobody ever finding out the real story; my guess is that the data was hacked because the DNC guys were bozos, and it likely got sold several times until it ended up in Wikileaks' hands. Frankly, the NSA/FBI/CIA are as likely culprits as the GRU given the actual evidence.

GLADIO lives on

Great news for seasteading.

Like here, they called it a "space" program