<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/styles/rss-style.xsl"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>teodesian.net</title>
<link>http://teodesian.net//posts/c1b65a8c-13f6-11ec-bdd7-a8656929205f?format=xml</link>
<description>teodesian.net : /posts/c1b65a8c-13f6-11ec-bdd7-a8656929205f</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>2026-05-03T03:49:29</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>2026-05-03T03:49:29</lastBuildDate>


<item>
<title>Doug Casey on FIFA and Globocop</title>
<link>http://teodesian.net/posts/c1b65a8c-13f6-11ec-bdd7-a8656929205f</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a class="usericon Doge" href="index.php?nav=4" title="Posted by Doge"></a></h3><blockquote><em>
First they sent a SWAT team to New Zealand to capture Kim Dotcom, a German national, for something that’s legal in both New Zealand and Germany, and I did not speak out — because I was not in the computer business. Then, they conducted drone strikes and assassinations and renditions around the world, and I did not speak out — because I was not a swarthy foreigner. Then, they invaded countries, from Granada and Panama, to Afghanistan and Iraq, and I did not speak out — because I believed we were always on the side of truth and justice. Then, they prosecuted the FIFA guys, and I did not speak out — because I couldn’t care less about rich guys making money from soccer. Etc. Etc.
</em></blockquote>
It is flat-out amazing that the DOJ is (ab)using the same commerce clause justification to squat on all 50 states to do the same to every nation in the world:
<blockquote><em>
    If you touch our shores with your corrupt enterprise, whether that is through meetings or through using our world-class financial system, you will be held accountable for that corruption.
<br /><br />
In other words, the Department of Justice’s indictment alleges that since a part of the alleged corruption may have been planned in the US — even if it was then carried out elsewhere — they are in charge. And the use of US banks to transfer US dollars gives them additional jurisdiction.
</em></blockquote>]]></description>
<author>nobody</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teodesian.net/posts/c1b65a8c-13f6-11ec-bdd7-a8656929205f</guid>
<pubDate>2015-08-03T08:26:24</pubDate>
<enclosure type="text/html" url="http://teodesian.net/posts/c1b65a8c-13f6-11ec-bdd7-a8656929205f" />
</item>
<item>
<title>Doug Casey on FIFA and Globocop</title>
<link>http://teodesian.net/posts/1438590384</link>
<description><![CDATA[<a class="usericon Doge" href="index.php?nav=4" title="Posted by Doge"></a></h3><blockquote><em>
First they sent a SWAT team to New Zealand to capture Kim Dotcom, a German national, for something that’s legal in both New Zealand and Germany, and I did not speak out — because I was not in the computer business. Then, they conducted drone strikes and assassinations and renditions around the world, and I did not speak out — because I was not a swarthy foreigner. Then, they invaded countries, from Granada and Panama, to Afghanistan and Iraq, and I did not speak out — because I believed we were always on the side of truth and justice. Then, they prosecuted the FIFA guys, and I did not speak out — because I couldn’t care less about rich guys making money from soccer. Etc. Etc.
</em></blockquote>
It is flat-out amazing that the DOJ is (ab)using the same commerce clause justification to squat on all 50 states to do the same to every nation in the world:
<blockquote><em>
    If you touch our shores with your corrupt enterprise, whether that is through meetings or through using our world-class financial system, you will be held accountable for that corruption.
<br /><br />
In other words, the Department of Justice’s indictment alleges that since a part of the alleged corruption may have been planned in the US — even if it was then carried out elsewhere — they are in charge. And the use of US banks to transfer US dollars gives them additional jurisdiction.
</em></blockquote>]]></description>
<author>nobody</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teodesian.net/posts/1438590384</guid>
<pubDate>2015-08-03T08:26:24</pubDate>
<enclosure type="text/html" url="http://teodesian.net/posts/1438590384" />
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
