<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/styles/rss-style.xsl"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>teodesian.net</title>
<link>http://teodesian.net//posts/a50cf8eb-13f5-11ec-bdd7-a69920652171?format=xml</link>
<description>teodesian.net : /posts/a50cf8eb-13f5-11ec-bdd7-a69920652171</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>2026-04-27T18:01:41</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>2026-04-27T18:01:41</lastBuildDate>


<item>
<title>Fred Reed on Evolution</title>
<link>http://teodesian.net/posts/a50cf8eb-13f5-11ec-bdd7-a69920652171</link>
<description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
I wanted to see how serious proponents of evolutionary biology would respond to awkward questions.
<br /><br />
It was like giving a bobcat a prostate exam. I got everything but answers. They told me I was a crank, implied over and over (again) that I was a Creationist, said that I was an enemy of science (someone who asks for evidence is an enemy of science). They said that I was trying to pull down modern biology (if you ask questions about an aspect of biology, you want to pull down biology). They told me I didn’t know anything (that’s why I was asking questions), and that I was a mere journalist (the validity of a question depends on its source rather than its content).
</blockquote>
It's the same with climate "science", when you really get down to it, there's no evidence their models accurately represent, well, anything.  This article is a great takedown of that, and all other heads of the hydra of scientism.]]></description>
<author>doge</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teodesian.net/posts/a50cf8eb-13f5-11ec-bdd7-a69920652171</guid>
<pubDate>2016-09-12T19:25:38</pubDate>
<enclosure url="http://teodesian.net/posts/a50cf8eb-13f5-11ec-bdd7-a69920652171" type="text/html" />
</item>
<item>
<title>Fred Reed on Evolution</title>
<link>http://teodesian.net/posts/1473708338</link>
<description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
I wanted to see how serious proponents of evolutionary biology would respond to awkward questions.
<br /><br />
It was like giving a bobcat a prostate exam. I got everything but answers. They told me I was a crank, implied over and over (again) that I was a Creationist, said that I was an enemy of science (someone who asks for evidence is an enemy of science). They said that I was trying to pull down modern biology (if you ask questions about an aspect of biology, you want to pull down biology). They told me I didn’t know anything (that’s why I was asking questions), and that I was a mere journalist (the validity of a question depends on its source rather than its content).
</blockquote>
It's the same with climate "science", when you really get down to it, there's no evidence their models accurately represent, well, anything.  This article is a great takedown of that, and all other heads of the hydra of scientism.]]></description>
<author>doge</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teodesian.net/posts/1473708338</guid>
<pubDate>2016-09-12T19:25:38</pubDate>
<enclosure type="text/html" url="http://teodesian.net/posts/1473708338" />
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
