<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/styles/rss-style.xsl"?>

<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule"
>

<channel>
<title>teodesian.net</title>
<link>http://teodesian.net//posts/8f3de1ab-13f5-11ec-bdd7-a66bc6cc977d?format=xml</link>
<description>teodesian.net : /posts/8f3de1ab-13f5-11ec-bdd7-a66bc6cc977d</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>2026-04-07T10:46:22</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>2026-04-07T10:46:22</lastBuildDate>


<item>
<title>Cloudflare bans 8chan</title>
<link>http://teodesian.net/posts/8f3de1ab-13f5-11ec-bdd7-a66bc6cc977d</link>
<description><![CDATA[Makes it clear that posting manifestos only ok on facebook.  Basically uses the same argument used against Ross Ulbricht to give him triple life:
<blockquote>
We reluctantly tolerate content that we find reprehensible, but we draw the line at platforms that have demonstrated they directly inspire tragic events and are lawless by design.
...The unresolved question is how should the law deal with platforms that ignore or actively thwart the Rule of Law?
</blockquote>
That would be like...ANARCHY???!!!  Tiresome idiots who perhaps should read <a href="https://mises.org/wire/myth-rule-law">this</a>.]]></description>
<author>doge</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teodesian.net/posts/8f3de1ab-13f5-11ec-bdd7-a66bc6cc977d</guid>
<pubDate>2019-08-05T08:05:53</pubDate>
<enclosure url="http://teodesian.net/posts/8f3de1ab-13f5-11ec-bdd7-a66bc6cc977d" type="text/html" />
</item>
<item>
<title>Cloudflare bans 8chan</title>
<link>http://teodesian.net/posts/1564992353</link>
<description><![CDATA[Makes it clear that posting manifestos only ok on facebook.  Basically uses the same argument used against Ross Ulbricht to give him triple life:
<blockquote>
We reluctantly tolerate content that we find reprehensible, but we draw the line at platforms that have demonstrated they directly inspire tragic events and are lawless by design.
...The unresolved question is how should the law deal with platforms that ignore or actively thwart the Rule of Law?
</blockquote>
That would be like...ANARCHY???!!!  Tiresome idiots who perhaps should read <a href="https://mises.org/wire/myth-rule-law">this</a>.]]></description>
<author>doge</author>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://teodesian.net/posts/1564992353</guid>
<pubDate>2019-08-05T08:05:53</pubDate>
<enclosure url="http://teodesian.net/posts/1564992353" type="text/html" />
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
