Headline Nudes - (12.09.13):
Well that's unsurprising. Another study backs up this one, showing that self-righteous liberals are the least tolerant
of dissenting views. Again, unsurprising behavior for state-worshippers.
It occurred to me that military occupation has practically never lasted for more than 18 years. I'm guessing that's because it's the time taken for a new generation to either be able to tolerate the new regime or to be completely hell-bent on resistance. Either way, the US' clock is ticking. The droning of weddings certainly doesn't bode well for the 'toleration' outcome.
When asked as to whether I support women in combat roles of a military, I reply thusly:
"No, because Men shouldn't either, as the rigors of the profession are capable of wrecking the hardiest of men that survive the ordeal." What doesn't kill you does not necesarily make one stronger; often it maims and cripples.
Unsurprising, since "Guess Who" sold them all the sarin in the first place. Also not surprising that Jabhat-Al-Nusra's posession of CWs was ignored. All this was pretty obvious to folks paying attention, of course, which is one of the big reasons the attack was stymied.
The beltarians become more of a joke daily.
Get killed in stereo.
The roid-heads tend to get really worked up when you make it obvious how immoral their professsion is
Eric Peters' analysis here is spot on -- if the principle espoused by the prosecutors is accepted, simply being around a drunk woman
is pretty much a guarantee that you become a criminal or a snitch.